1. East Sussex SAB
  2. Safeguarding guidance
  3. Learning briefings
  4. Thematic review: Working with multiple disadvantage and trauma

Thematic review: Working with multiple disadvantage and trauma

Background

East Sussex Safeguarding Adults Board commissioned this review to understand the circumstances of the deaths of four women.

They were all aged between 19 and 51 years and died between May and November 2020 from suicide or from causes linked to drug overdoses.

All the women had contact with some of the same health and social care services.

Several parallel themes were identified including:

  • childhood trauma
  • poor mental health
  • domestic abuse
  • substance misuse
  • homelessness
  • difficulty engaging with individuals who are hard to reach
  • the impact of Covid-19 on service delivery and the impact on people’s mental health and wellbeing.

Key findings

  • Suicide prediction and prevention requires consideration of multiple factors including background, events, and stressors.
  • Organisational policies and practices will need to change to support hard to engage people who have traumatic life histories.
  • Think Family approaches may be useful to support engagement and harm prevention.

Key learning

We encourage managers to explore these learning points in team meetings and supervision. 

Don't rely solely on what a person says

Adverse experiences, trauma and prolonged substance misuse use can result in frontal lobe brain damage. This can affect behaviour and decision making. It is essential to undertake a mental capacity assessment to assess the person's ability to put a decision into effect (executive functioning).

Working relationships

Consider who is best placed to work creatively and proactively with someone who does not wish to engage. For example, they may already have a positive working relationship with another professional. This might be a worker from a voluntary agency, care agency or health service.

The review identified the following themes for learning.

Suicide prevention

Trauma-informed

  • Do you and your agency take a trauma-informed approach which recognises and responds to the impact of adverse childhood experiences in adulthood?

  • Do you ask individuals about their childhood experiences?

Multiple disadvantage

  • Are you confident in when and how to refer individuals with multiple disadvantages to the multi-agency risk management (MARM) forum to manage their risks?

    Multi-agency risk management (MARM)

  • Have you considered the effects of substance dependency on mental capacity?

  • Do you offer different approaches to engage with people, such as face to face, text, phone, and virtual communication?

  • Does your agency ensure cases remain open when an individual is not engaging?

  • Does the person have a lead practitioner to maintain contact, provide assertive outreach and gain initial support from other agencies?




Was this page helpful?

Click or tap the rating which best represents your experience.